On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy at gentoo.org> wrote:

> Ian Clarke schrieb:
> Do you really think, that having some nice javascript or otherwise
> adjusted interface would magically raise the numbers of users?
>

I think having a nice, well defined user interface will raise the number of
users, yes.  Javascript is just a means to this end, since it's well suited
to rich web UIs, which Freenet requires.


> Some eye-candy


I'm not talking about "eye-candy", I'm talking about good user interface
design.


> wont keep new users nor will it get you many new users,
> it is way more important to have a reliable working freenet with some
> nice additional apps (which themselves should also be reliable).
> The only reliable working additional apps seem to be FMS and maybe Frost
> (where the later has of course issues with spam). So due to the spam,
> the only app left is in the end FMS. Now instead of supporting that,
> something different is started and suggested (with wot and freetalk),
> which still have many issues, are not reliable and where until now
> nobody was able to even tell me, how wot itself works.
>

So what is your point?  The fact that Freetalk isn't perfect means that if
someone is willing to work on a different aspect of Freenet we should tell
them to go away?


> So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly
> shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some
> sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or
> there is no content. A cool web-UI wont change those points, so from my
> perspective, a different interface may be nice, but it wont solve the
> bigger issues with freenet.
>

So again, you think that just because a new UI won't solve *every* problem
with Freenet, then we shouldn't do it?  That's completely illogical.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke
Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120307/b6ef941f/attachment.html>

Reply via email to