On 2013/08/05 (Aug), at 6:57 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > That sounds like a breach in the security model to me. I do not want to > write something for Freenet that phones home.
If it was *expected* to phone home (e.g. to collect users platform/ram/hd stats), I might agree. What I have in mind, however, is self-limiting. If the software does what it is intended to do, it does not phone home; and if it fails, we can then fix it (so that it doesn't). What's more, (and as Matthew noted) we can easily make it an de-checkable checkbox for those who care. -- Robert Hailey
