> - move the github repo to xwiki-contrib/retired

I guess you mean "move the github repo to xwiki-contrib" because
merging XEM and retired repository would be a pain (a not even sure it
would work fully). I prefer to just move the repo to contrib and
indicate it's retired like we did for other modules.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
> gdelhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> Almost everybody has voted so I think this proposal is approved.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/13 Sergiu Dumitriu <ser...@xwiki.com>
>>
>> > On 09/13/2013 08:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <ser...@xwiki.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> On 09/11/2013 05:58 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote:
>> > >>> Since Enterprise embeds Workspaces by default since 5.2-m2, I think
>> it
>> > does
>> > >>> not make any sense to release XWiki Manager (XEM) anymore.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The build is currently broken (because of the XAR organization
>> > changes).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> So I propose to remove XWiki Manager:
>> > >>> - stop releasing it
>> > >>> - move the github repo to xwiki-contrib/retired
>> > >>> - update manager.xwiki.org to explain the changes in XWiki 5.2.
>> > >>> - move the manager jira to the retired category
>> > >>> - remove the build in ci.xwiki.org
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Here is my non-binding +1.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> LM
>> > >>
>> > >> -1. This is very premature, the new workspaces haven't been available
>> > >> for a long enough time to be sure it is a good replacement for XEM.
>> > >>
>> > >> Do workspaces fulfill all the needs of existing XEM users?
>> > >
>> > > XEM became a workspaces manager in 3.3 (see
>> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XEM-202) so there is nothing new here.
>> > > The only difference between the new XE and XEM is that wiki manager UI
>> > > is not included while it was hidden in XEM so it's not a big change
>> > > for users since it's super easy to install with Extension Manager.
>> > >
>> > > XEM is and always been pretty much only a set of pom.xml files with
>> > > dependencies and not much more than a home page. Guillaume moved
>> > > Workspaces from XEM to XE making XEM pretty much useless now.
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Does the new implementation offer support for the Farm usage?
>> > >
>> > > You can install Wiki Manager UI using Extension Manager.
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Is there a clear migration path? Manual or automatic?
>> > >>
>> > >> Is the new wiki management UI going to be at least as easy to use as
>> the
>> > >> old one? What's the learning curve for administrators?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> If the build is broken, it's easier to fix it than to upset a large
>> > >> userbase. Why do we insist so much on maintaining backwards
>> > >> compatibility for Java APIs that we're almost certain nobody uses, yet
>> > >> we're OK with dropping an entire product without a proven alternative,
>> > >> hoping that in one or two more releases that alternative will actually
>> > >> be fully implemented?
>> > >
>> > > The point here is that the alternative is XE. We don't remove XEM
>> > > because the build is broken... It simply does not worth the effort to
>> > > keep it anymore since XE expose the same features.
>> >
>> > Given that as a downstream user I don't really use multiwikis in any
>> > way, this doesn't affect me at all. So +1, less code is always better.
>> > One product less means less confusion for users.
>> >
>> > My main complaint was about the backwards compatibility rule that's not
>> > being followed.
>> > --
>> > Sergiu Dumitriu
>> > http://purl.org/net/sergiu
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devs mailing list
>> > devs@xwiki.org
>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> devs@xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to