On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:

>> - move the github repo to xwiki-contrib/retired
> 
> I guess you mean "move the github repo to xwiki-contrib" because
> merging XEM and retired repository would be a pain (a not even sure it
> would work fully). I prefer to just move the repo to contrib and
> indicate it's retired like we did for other modules.

Yes I agree. We'll just need a README.md to let the users know it's not active 
anymore.

We need to decide on a rule for retired project (not sure we agreed although we 
discussed it). I also much prefer keeping each extension in its own repo and 
mention in a README.md about its status.

Thanks
-Vincent

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Almost everybody has voted so I think this proposal is approved.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2013/9/13 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>>> On 09/13/2013 08:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/11/2013 05:58 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote:
>>>>>>> Since Enterprise embeds Workspaces by default since 5.2-m2, I think
>>> it
>>>> does
>>>>>>> not make any sense to release XWiki Manager (XEM) anymore.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The build is currently broken (because of the XAR organization
>>>> changes).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I propose to remove XWiki Manager:
>>>>>>> - stop releasing it
>>>>>>> - move the github repo to xwiki-contrib/retired
>>>>>>> - update manager.xwiki.org to explain the changes in XWiki 5.2.
>>>>>>> - move the manager jira to the retired category
>>>>>>> - remove the build in ci.xwiki.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here is my non-binding +1.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LM
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -1. This is very premature, the new workspaces haven't been available
>>>>>> for a long enough time to be sure it is a good replacement for XEM.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do workspaces fulfill all the needs of existing XEM users?
>>>>> 
>>>>> XEM became a workspaces manager in 3.3 (see
>>>>> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XEM-202) so there is nothing new here.
>>>>> The only difference between the new XE and XEM is that wiki manager UI
>>>>> is not included while it was hidden in XEM so it's not a big change
>>>>> for users since it's super easy to install with Extension Manager.
>>>>> 
>>>>> XEM is and always been pretty much only a set of pom.xml files with
>>>>> dependencies and not much more than a home page. Guillaume moved
>>>>> Workspaces from XEM to XE making XEM pretty much useless now.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does the new implementation offer support for the Farm usage?
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can install Wiki Manager UI using Extension Manager.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there a clear migration path? Manual or automatic?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is the new wiki management UI going to be at least as easy to use as
>>> the
>>>>>> old one? What's the learning curve for administrators?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If the build is broken, it's easier to fix it than to upset a large
>>>>>> userbase. Why do we insist so much on maintaining backwards
>>>>>> compatibility for Java APIs that we're almost certain nobody uses, yet
>>>>>> we're OK with dropping an entire product without a proven alternative,
>>>>>> hoping that in one or two more releases that alternative will actually
>>>>>> be fully implemented?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The point here is that the alternative is XE. We don't remove XEM
>>>>> because the build is broken... It simply does not worth the effort to
>>>>> keep it anymore since XE expose the same features.
>>>> 
>>>> Given that as a downstream user I don't really use multiwikis in any
>>>> way, this doesn't affect me at all. So +1, less code is always better.
>>>> One product less means less confusion for users.
>>>> 
>>>> My main complaint was about the backwards compatibility rule that's not
>>>> being followed.
>>>> --
>>>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>>>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devs mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to