On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 19:59:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 16:14:59 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 14:14:33 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 14:08:32 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 18:05:40 UTC, 9il wrote:
It was a mockery executed by Atila
Read the all comments and didnt saw any mockery

Yes, it wasn't explicit. He didn't write bad words, he did a bad decision. Bad for D.

I apologise if what I wrote came across as mockery; it certainly wasn't intended that way.

How would you have liked for me to have handled it better?

I am not speaking for Ilya, but from skimming through the dialogue it struck me that you didn't respond from the perspective of managing the process, but from a pure engineer mindset of providing alternatives.

It would've been better if you started by 1. understanding the issue 2. acknowledging that the type system has an obvious bug 3. looking at the issue from the perspective of the person bringing attention to the issue. I don't think anyone was looking for workarounds, but looking for

1. acknowledgment of the issue
2. acknowledgment of what the issue leads to in terms of inconvenience
3. a forward looking vision for future improvements

+1

Reply via email to