On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 11:28:23 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
```
final abstract class Algo {
void drawLine(Canvas c, Pos from, Pos to) { ...... };
}
```
This solution seems like a bit of a hack, which is why I don't
like it.
Interesting solution if you put `static:` in there.
Alternatively you could create a module, but then it would just
be a function without a clear type.
Why do you want a type?
Is anyone aware of a non-ugly way to implement a 'static' class
or namespace?
Use a struct and put `static:` after the opening brace. That's
what GC is in core.memory.
