On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 17:21:04 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 16:59:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ola Fosheim Grøstad:
Shouldn't sorted range maintain the invariant automatically
in order to remain typesafe?
Yes, of course.
If SortedRange is fixed, please also switch the names of
upperBound and lowerBound… They are currently wrong. An
upperBound on something should return the values lower than it
and a lowerBound should return values larger…
(C++ got it right).
D got it right. C++ returns an iterator which can be a bit
confusing. D returns a slice so it's meaning is much clearer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_and_lower_bounds
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/upper_bound/
