On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 22:14:33 UTC, Xinok wrote:
In general, I don't feel that SortedRange is an ideal solution anyways. Wrapping ranges in a struct adds too much overhead and we can't extend the functionality of it. Would it be possible to replace SortedRange with a @sorted attribute or something?
You might be interested in the this proposal: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/tpctqjlvnrrasikte...@forum.dlang.org I think it is doable… ;)
