On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 20:06:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 2 November 2014 at 19:54:38 UTC, Xinok wrote:
D got it right. C++ returns an iterator which can be a bit
confusing. D returns a slice so it's meaning is much clearer.
No, according to docs D has defined the lower bound to be the
negation of the lower bound…
Sorry, you're right, it's not an "upper bound". I read that
definition a few times over and still got it wrong. O_o
In terms of what to call it, perhaps what you're looking for is
"upper set"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_set
