On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:35:15 +0000 aldanor via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I guess two of my gripes with UFCS is (a) you really have to use > public imports in the modules where the target types are defined > so you bring all the symbols in whether you want it or not (b) > you lose access to private members because it's not the same > module anymore (correct me if I'm wrong?). Plus, you need to > decorate every single free function with a template constraint. you can make a package and set protection to `package` instead of `private`, so your function will still be able to access internal fields, but package users will not. this feature is often missed by the people who are used to `public`/`protected`/`private` triad.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
