On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:07:13 +0000 aldanor via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I see, thanks! :) I've started liking structs more and more > recently as well and been pondering on how to convert a > class-based code that looks like this (only the base class has > any data): p.s. can't you convert most of that to free functions? thanks to UFCS you'll be able to use them with `obj.func` notation. and by either defining `package` protection for class fields, or simply writing that functions in the same module they will have access to internal object stuff. and if you can return `obj` from each function, you can go with templates and chaining. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
