-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Sabalausky wrote: > Yea, I was going to mention that, too. As far as I'm concerned "*make" is > the same sort of undead unholy relic as C++. Ie, They've served their use, > but these days they're terrible anachronisms that just need to be allowed to > finally die. SCons absolutely *kills* make, and last I looked, AAP was even > better than SCons (IMO). Not to get into an AAP vs SCons debate or anything, > but my point is, with all the stuff out there that's so much better than > *make, there's really not much reason beyond pure inertia and ignorance of > the alternatives to keep holding onto it. > I don't know AAP. Do you have a link? A quick look on google and freshmeat didn't return anything useful...
Jerome - -- mailto:jeber...@free.fr http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknGFo8ACgkQd0kWM4JG3k/C3gCePrhQnhCudgr2x69/esmR58bM HngAmwbscbfRd7cIrJpb94BTCVeQWWCf =gj5+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----