-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Georg Wrede wrote:
> Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Yea, I was going to mention that, too. As far as I'm concerned
>>> "*make" is the same sort of undead unholy relic as C++. Ie, They've
>>> served their use, but these days they're terrible anachronisms that
>>> just need to be allowed to finally die. SCons absolutely *kills*
>>> make, and last I looked, AAP was even better than SCons (IMO). Not to
>>> get into an AAP vs SCons debate or anything, but my point is, with
>>> all the stuff out there that's so much better than *make, there's
>>> really not much reason beyond pure inertia and ignorance of the
>>> alternatives to keep holding onto it.
>> I don't know AAP. Do you have a link? A quick look on google and
>> freshmeat didn't return anything useful...
>
> http://www.a-a-p.org/
Thanks, I've taken a look and it seems interesting except that it
does a lot of things I don't really need...
Jerome
- --
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknJNf4ACgkQd0kWM4JG3k9mcACgrP1/iDwPpSwFgQ2cxjaXoDiL
likAn2FTdwDuH74VpIajG3NlpldUidXE
=jkFw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
