"BCS" <a...@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:78ccfa2d3e7918cb909fe7a39...@news.digitalmars.com... > Reply to Denis, > >>> I'd be fine depricating /**/. >>> >> You mean, deprecating /++/? >> > > No, I mean exactly what I said. > /**/ has well defined semantics, changing it will cause problems that > replacing it will not. >
Are there any problems you see with it other than porting code to D? (FWIW, I've never come across any code that had a /* in between a /* and */.)