Now I'm working that. Kenji Hara
2012/11/16 Don Clugston <d...@nospam.com> > On 16/11/12 05:15, Rob T wrote: > >> On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:41:45 UTC, Stugol wrote: >> >>> Event_t e2; // Will compile! >>>> >>> >>> Yeah but that kinda blows, doesn't it? >>> >>> >> I found it surprising or unintuitive that the !() is required, and I do >> want to know what is the reasoning behind it, >> > > One of the oldest open enhancement requests is on this topic: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=1012<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012> > > I don't what the reason is. It'd be interesting to revive the patch there, > and see if it passes the compiler test suite. >
