On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 07:27:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2012 08:24:27 deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 00:57:30 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
> It doesn't hide the source in any effective way. There are
> enough Java byte code => source translators around to prove
> that. It only takes one such tool to exist (and it's
> especially
> easy to create such a tool given D being open source).
Oh, so that's why java is never used in any company !
Java is used quite heavily by companies.
No it isn't, because they are afraid of bytecode decoders like
jad or JD.
