On Monday, December 17, 2012 08:39:56 deadalnix wrote: > On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 07:27:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > On Monday, December 17, 2012 08:24:27 deadalnix wrote: > >> On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 00:57:30 UTC, Walter Bright > >> > >> wrote: > >> > It doesn't hide the source in any effective way. There are > >> > enough Java byte code => source translators around to prove > >> > that. It only takes one such tool to exist (and it's > >> > especially > >> > easy to create such a tool given D being open source). > >> > >> Oh, so that's why java is never used in any company ! > > > > Java is used quite heavily by companies. > > No it isn't, because they are afraid of bytecode decoders like > jad or JD.
There may very well be companies which avoid it because of that, but I don't see how you can possibly think that Java isn't used heavily in the corporate world, since it is. - Jonathan M Davis