Re: this is almost a workaround for the lack of named parameters

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-03-21 22:18, bearophile wrote:

You show code like:

void foo ({ int x, int y } point)
{
}

foo({ y: 5, x: 3 });


D already has two kinds of tuples so I don't want a "third kind" of
tuple. What I want is D to manage better the Phobos Tuple we already
have, adding an unpacking syntax
(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gridjorxqlpoytuxw...@forum.dlang.org ).
(This is not supposed to solve the named arguments problem).

This is not a tuple, it's an anonymous struct.

--
/Jacob Carlborg