Re: this is almost a workaround for the lack of named parameters

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-03-26 10:31, renoX wrote:

Interesting, the "doesn't not support passing the arguments out of
order." can be seen either as a (temporary or not) implementation
limitation OR as a feature.

I would guess it was easier. At least the change is very small. Smaller 
that I would have imagined.

The things to check is how this feature would work with optional
parameters..

Good point.

--
/Jacob Carlborg