On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 18:06:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 17:48:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
It would interest me which of the suggestions would be rather
accepted.
- scope ref as Kenji suggested
- Or rather @ref because this is the way that D usually goes
when it comes to subsequent expansions.
What do you think?
I am against introducing new one-symbol meanings, it always
looks like a hack. scope ref is much more elegant but I still
can't get straight in my mind what this combination does mean
from the abstract type system point of view.
So you were against the introduction of ravalue references or do
you just have a problem with the syntax?
