On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 17:48:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
It would interest me which of the suggestions would be rather
accepted.
- scope ref as Kenji suggested
- Or rather @ref because this is the way that D usually goes
when it comes to subsequent expansions.
What do you think?
I am against introducing new one-symbol meanings, it always looks
like a hack. scope ref is much more elegant but I still can't get
straight in my mind what this combination does mean from the
abstract type system point of view.
