On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 07:53:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
Honestly, any new module could have appeared for approval at
this
particular moment and I would have made the same criticisms.
Observation: this move wasn't something I would encourage. Jesse,
the review manager for std.process, has specifically asked:
Please place any further comments in the official review thread
leaving only your vote and a short comment (there should be no
need to reply to anyone).
There was ample time to discuss std.process during the informal
and formal review. However, the situation with your replies is
even worse: they don't even concern std.process in particular.
Please consider starting a new thread next time, and stating your
criticism aside to whatever poor module comes up the review queue
;)
