On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 09:03:34 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
09-Aug-2013 04:53, Tyler Jameson Little пишет:
According to the review queue, there there are 5 items that are
currently ready for review. There was even a thread a while
back about
starting another formal review, where both Jacob Carlborg and
Brian
Schott said they're ready for review:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gjonxudcdiwrlkgww...@forum.dlang.org
(it
mostly digressed into bickering about the review process...).
Truth be told the wiki page is a bit misleading:
std.compression.lz77 - might be ready for review (as in code)
but needs to address fundamental design decisions and get the
right interface for all streaming (de)compressors.
std.idioms - a great idea but at the moment it hardly pulls its
weight providing only a couple of helpers
Yeah, I saw that. I was actually part-way through implementing
the DEFLATE algorithm when I realized the interface should
probably be a community decision. Then I ran out of time...
I'm particularly
interested in the outcome of the formal review of
std.serialize, because
I'd like to see a decent replacement for std.json (I'd be
willing to
contribute as well).
Then you would need to design a new std.json or land a hand in
such a project.
std.serialization should simply use it then as a backend not
the other way around.
I'm willing to contribute code, but I feel any contribution would
have to wait until std.serialization has gone through review. I'd
ultimately prefer something simple like my PR:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/885, but
I'm hesitant to add yet another item to the review queue,
especially since std.serialization may obsolete my work.
I havn't seen anything in this mailing list (except the above
and one by
Walter Bright) for a while, and I haven't seen any pull
requests for any
of the items in the review queue.
Well previously reviewed std.uni got pulled recently. Things
are moving but slooowly.
Is this due to the review process review? Who do I bug to get
things underway? I'd offer to act as review manager, but I don't
feel I have enough clout in the community to do so.
