On Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 09:15:52 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I'm against it. More important than such a gimmick are the many open bugs, auto ref, AA, scope, etc. And don't forget the implementation of the virtual keyword.
+1
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member function... dennis luehring
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Jonathan M Davis
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Ramon
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Lionello Lunesu
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Walter Bright
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... Peter Williams
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... Walter Bright
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of agg... Paolo Invernizzi
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Brian Schott
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Namespace
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... Michael
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates Michel Fortin
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of agg... Ettienne Gilbert
- Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggrega... deadalnix
