Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[Tove]

Wouldn't this style be an acceptable compromise instead? with 
both declaration and definition 100% identical.

struct S
{
  // member function declarations
  static int mfunc1(int a, int b = 5) pure;
  static int mfunc2(int a, int b = 5) pure;
  static int mfunc3(int a, int b = 5) pure;
  // member function definitions
  static int mfunc1(int a, int b = 5) pure
  {
  }
  static int mfunc2(int a, int b = 5) pure
  {
  }
  static int mfunc3(int a, int b = 5) pure
  {
  }
}