On 9/7/2013 9:46 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On an implementation note, I don't think that #5 is strong enough. I think that it should be an outright error if there is a difference between the declaration and definition rather than giving one precedence over the other.
I'll point out that C++ has equivalent behavior, and it has not resulted in any complaints I've ever heard. When you outline a C++ member function, you do not need to add 'static', 'private', 'virtual', and in fact you cannot add the latter two.
