On 08/09/13 16:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/7/2013 11:08 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
In summary, you've gotten rid of the need for this type of duplication
so why
would you introduce it?
I believe that is covered in the "Rationale" section of the dip.
Couldn't see a rational answer to my question in the rationale.
Looked more like a "I want to do this and I think that we should change
the language syntax to allow it" statement to me. It doesn't really add
functionality just makes what's there more complex.
Peter
