Re: new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[nazriel]

On Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 10:59:34 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 09/08/2013 06:46 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If I had to vote though, I'd vote against this, because I 
think that
it's a bad paradigm, and I don't want to deal with it.

+1

+1

Also issues mentioned by Manu are easily solvable:

DI files and/or DDOC + remove one level of indentation after 
class:

---
class Foo
{


void foo()
{
    writeln("hello world");
}


}
---

;)