On Thursday, 3 October 2013 at 11:14:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
As the one who'd be managing the review process, do you have
any preferences for how I handle the issues I raised above? Do
you think it'd be better to parcel the potentially broadly
useful code out across different Phobos modules as suggested or
let the review process decide what goes where?
My role as review manager does not matter here. Responsibility of
review manager is to collect opinions and information from
community, he does not have any authority of his own.
Remembering std.serialization discussion though, it felt like
people are more in favor of merging generic functionality into
matching modules instead of keeping everything self-contained.
You can also just do pull requests for smaller parts without any
review if they are decoupled from std.rational - but be warned
that waiting until those are reviewed and merged by Phobos devs
may take a considerable time ;)
In the end it is your own judgment. There are no strict rules and
it is always good to see a module with personality behind ;)
