On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 05:22:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think that it's worth noting that if this vote passes, it
will be the first
vote for a Phobos module which passed and had any "no" votes
cast against it
(at least, if any of the previous modules had any "no" votes, I
don't recall
them; it's always been overwhelmingly in favor of inclusion).
That in and of
itself implies that the situation needs further examination.
Though maybe it's
simply that this particular module is in an area where we have
more posters
with strong opinions.
I had noticed this. I'm not sure if a simple majority is good
enough for the standard library.
