On 11/29/13 5:47 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-29 03:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We'll probably keep it but not advertise it. But you're making a
terrible argument - you want us to keep a bankrupt artifact just because
you don't want to update your code.
That's the standard argument, "can't remove/change this, will break
backwards compatibility".
I'd say alternative installers are in a different category than user
code. Anyhow, you are making a good point that if your tool is out
there, others may be too.
Andrei
