On 2013-12-23 01:39:24 +0000, "Dicebot" <pub...@dicebot.lv> said:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54
This is follow-up of several hot discussion threads that have happened
several months ago. It has become pretty clear that there is no good
way out of existing situation and least bad needs to be picked just to
move forward (because it still be better than current horrible one)
Linked proposal was discussed in short e-mail conversation with Andrei
(with silent observation with Walter) and is mostly pre-approved. I am
interested in general opinion of community and suggestions for any
smaller tweaks before starting to work on pull requests.
Thanks for your attention.
I do like this DIP.
I used to prefer auto-expanding, but working with C++11 templates
convinced me otherwise. This is coming from someone who implemented a
crazy function forwarding scheme for the template-based D/Objective-C
bridge (not to confuse with the D/Objective-C compiler hack that came
later).
That said, it'd be nice if the language reference and the compiler
errors related to the language-level "tuple" used a different name than
tuple too.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.ca
http://michelf.ca
