On Tuesday, 24 December 2013 at 04:48:57 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
[1] Assuming that the case for non-auto-expanding lists can be argued sufficiently for inclusion in Phobos, which is yet to be seen. This DIP doesn't seem to even try.
Clarification: "Assuming that the case for non-auto-expanding lists can be
argued sufficiently for inclusion in Phobos, in the context of list algorithms that take a variadic number of variadic lists as arguments."
I feel that non-expanding lists only make sense in the context of these niche algorithms for the reasons explained in the parent post, and thus do not warrant conflation with auto-expanding lists.
