On 2/11/2014 5:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
For example, you have
been arguing in PR to keep `lwr` and `upr` identifiers while quick grep shows
that there is not a single place in Phobos which uses such naming scheme in
public API.


grep -i -r lwr *.d
std\traits.d:        alias G Lwr;
std\traits.d:            enum ok = functionLinkage!Upr == functionLinkage!Lwr;
std\traits.d: enum ok = variadicFunctionStyle!Upr == variadicFunctionStyle!Lwr; std\traits.d: // Note the order of arguments. The convertion order Lwr -> Upr is std\traits.d: // correct since Upr should be semantically 'narrower' than Lwr.
std\traits.d:            enum ok = isStorageClassImplicitlyConvertible!(Lwr, 
Upr);
std\traits.d:            enum lwrAtts = functionAttributes!Lwr;
std\traits.d:                (  (uprAtts & wantExact)   == (lwrAtts & wantExact)) 
&&
std\traits.d: ( (uprAtts & FA.pure_ ) >= (lwrAtts & FA.pure_ )) && std\traits.d: ( (uprAtts & FA.nothrow_) >= (lwrAtts & FA.nothrow_)) && std\traits.d: (!!(uprAtts & safety ) >= !!(lwrAtts & safety )) ;
std\traits.d:            enum ok = is(ReturnType!Upr : ReturnType!Lwr);
std\traits.d:            alias ParameterTypeTuple!Lwr LwrParams;
std\traits.d:            alias ParameterStorageClassTuple!Lwr LwrPSTCs;
std\traits.d:                    enum lwrStc = LwrPSTCs[i];
std\traits.d: ((uprStc & wantExact ) == (lwrStc & wantExact )) && std\traits.d: ((uprStc & STC.scope_) >= (lwrStc & STC.scope_)) &&
std\traits.d:            static if (UprParams.length == LwrParams.length)
std\traits.d: enum ok = is(UprParams == LwrParams) && checkNext!(0).ok;
std\typetuple.d: * type tuple. TL[$(I lwr) .. $(I upr)] returns a new type

Reply via email to