On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:51:47 -0500 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> > and this is not only about this particular patch, it's about the things > > i already mentioned in this discussion. such as having tools that says > > that they are for patches and then blaming the people who used that > > tools per disclaimer as "don't do what we wrote here!" see the picture? > > Let's say, we remove the "proposed patch" text from the "Add an > attachment" field. All good? You will use github then? i will not use github under any circumstances, but this will be one little step along the long "consistency road". at least nobody will be blamed for using bugzilla according to it's disclaimer. and surely i will stop ranting about that, 'cause i deliberately chose GTFO instead of github, according to rules.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
