On Friday, 9 January 2015 at 06:17:28 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:27:53 +0100
Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>
wrote:

On 08/01/15 22:02, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> am i fobidding someone to reply? O_O
>
> but yes, i want to create an impression that timewasters are > not
> welcome.

Well, it's one thing if you make that decision about people who are in contact with you personally. It's a bit different if you are unilaterally deciding to make that decision as a member of a collective forum of people, because in that case it's a bit of an imposition on the rest of us.
and if i'm not reacting, it's painting *me* wrong.

i.e. just because _you've_ decided that he's a timewaster, doesn't make it OK for you to try and make him feel unwelcome in a forum that belongs to a wider community.
if he is intelligent enough, he will understand that nobody can talk for the whole community, so in the worst case he will ignore myself personally. if he is not intelligent enough... oh, well, as nobody else wants to be a judge, i will be one. i don't feel wrong calling someone "timewaster" if he *is* one. and i can smell 'em from a distance.


It's not about intelligence, and I'm surprised that an intelligent man like you would think otherwise. It's not reasonable to generalize community based upon only one member of said community, but it still happens. Everywhere, to everyone, because humans are like that. Instead of admitting of being unwelcoming, you swing the other way and accuse people of being not intelligent enough. That's absolutely ridiculous behavior that should not be acceptable in any friendly community. </rant>

Reply via email to