On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 09:36:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
You said it yourself that to get performance from C you need
extensions, it's not provided by C semantics itself.
No? I said I write "cpu independent simd" in my core
performance oriented loop as a starting point.
I mean this:
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 07:11:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Here's the deal: there is no such thing as a general purpose
(system) language in the empirical sense. We might have been
lead to believe that C or C++ were general purpose, but that
only happend because there were no visible viable alternatives.
C is more and more becoming a kernel/embedded language, C++ is
more and more becoming a legacy/niche language. C++ is only a
game dev language after you add various extensions (e.g. simd).
It is only a number-crunching language after you add some other
extensions.
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM,... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM, Clang, and S... Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Creator of LLVM, Clang, and Swift Says... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
-