Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > > I think GC.collect may simply evict the entire cache. The collection > cycle costs so much, the marginal cost of losing cached information is > lost in the noise.
Right. The GC already has an LRU cache of size 1 (ie. LRU entry) for GC.sizeOf() and GC.query(), and these values are cleared on a collection by necessity, since pages can be repurposed if they're been completely emptied.
