== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article > dsimcha wrote: > > Started playing w/ the implementation a little and I see a problem. What > > about > > the garbage collector? There are two possibilities: > [snip] > > The only possible solutions I see would be to have the GC know everything > > about > > the LRU cache and evict stale entries (probably slows down GC a lot, a huge > > PITA > > to implement, couples things that shouldn't be tightly coupled), or clear > > the > > cache every time GC is run (probably would make appending so slow as to > > defeat the > > purpose of having the cache). > I think GC.collect may simply evict the entire cache. The collection > cycle costs so much, the marginal cost of losing cached information is > lost in the noise. > Andrei
But then you have to copy the whole array again, likely triggering another GC if the array is large. Then things really get ugly as, for all practical purposes, you've completely done away with the cache.
