On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 17:17:39 UTC, JerryR wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 16:05:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
But 2.060 was released in 2012...
Yes I know it's old but and the reason was to avoid breakage
that already had happened before.
I know that sometimes this (Breakage) is inevitable as the
language grows, but my concern here is that the language isn't
new, and it's in version +2, and again I was changing from
2.060 to 2.066... which looking now is already lagged since
the new version is 2.069.
JerryR.
I would strongly recommend moving straight to 2.069. It will take
very little extra effort compared to going to 2.066 and there's
been a lot of improvements and bugfixes since then. Some of the
failures to compile you're seeing might even be bugs in 2.066!
