On 21/01/16 6:46 PM, Anon wrote: snip
I thought I did a good enough job of explaining that in the DIP so I wouldn't have to here.
I was trying to explain some better semantics because how it is currently with strings can be and is a bit ambiguous.
Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:46:17 -0800
On 21/01/16 6:46 PM, Anon wrote: snip
I thought I did a good enough job of explaining that in the DIP so I wouldn't have to here.
I was trying to explain some better semantics because how it is currently with strings can be and is a bit ambiguous.