On Saturday, 21 May 2016 at 18:18:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
He said that that won't happen any longer, the growth was
because of the return type. Is that correct?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15831#c4
Looks like growth is due to the fact that the voldemort type is
in the scope of a function and function is fun!(T).fun(T) - hence
each level multiplies by 2. And return type is not part of the
mangled name already - that would cause circular dependency, you
would need the voldemort type mangling to generate it.
