On 03.08.2017 21:28, 12345swordy wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:02:17 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03.08.2017 20:32, 12345swordy wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 10:43:50 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 20:28:38 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
...No? I was referring to the c++ proposal paper.
The paper doesn't propose to enforce coding standards to the point
you want. D already does what the paper proposes.
Page 2:
"Enable writing
compiler-enforced
patterns for any purpose:
coding standards
(e.g., many
Core Guidelines
“enforce” rules)
"
Yes, it does, right there. Are you reading the same paper that I am?
On 02.08.2017 15:50, 12345swordy wrote:
> Is it to much to ask for d developers to provide a way to enforce
custom
coding standards in a similar fashion that @nogc and @safe does?
How would you use the proposed features to implement @safe or @nogc
within C++?
I am not interested in arguing about what I said or I didn't said.
I don't understand the relevance of this sentence.
Regardless what you asking is ridiculous, as 1.) there is no gc exist in
c++ in the first place
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boehm_garbage_collector
2.)it's still a concept at this point of time
which may be rejected in the future.
How does that make my question ridiculous?
