On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:45:12 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03.08.2017 21:28, 12345swordy wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 19:02:17 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03.08.2017 20:32, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]
On 02.08.2017 15:50, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]
How would you use the proposed features to implement @safe or
@nogc within C++?
I am not interested in arguing about what I said or I didn't
said.
I don't understand the relevance of this sentence.
Regardless what you asking is ridiculous, as 1.) there is no
gc exist in c++ in the first place
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boehm_garbage_collector
2.)it's still a concept at this point of time which may be
rejected in the future.
How does that make my question ridiculous?
You are splinting hairs here. The gc that you linked is a third
party library, that is not the same as having it built into the
language itself. Clear difference.
Alex
