On Sunday, 27 August 2017 at 18:08:52 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
The requirements are rather vague, you can interpret it in a
number of ways.
The sensible interpretation imho is "as low an install
footprint as possible while still fulfilling the other
requirements". I'm not aware of anything below ~20MB install
footprint that fulfills the other requirements, but I'd be
interested if you know any.
The install requirement is arbitrary, and why 20MB? It just seems
like you are trying to advertise that program for some reason.
I wouldn't consider 200MB gigantic in comparison to 20MB cause
there is literally no difference of use for me.
The thread is about OP's requirements.
So replace me with anyone.
You'd have to have a really shitty laptop for it to be an
issue.
Not relevant.
It is relevant, shit, even with a shitty laptop you can upgrade
the hdd and then it becomes a non-issue anyways.
