Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote: > Johannes Pfau Wrote: > >> On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote: >> > >> > This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough >> > for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I >> > think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional >> > looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always >> > spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document >> > generation. >> > >> > Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that >> > C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users >> > haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not >> > possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a >> > better tool in less than a week, blindfolded. >> >> What's the point of this post? >> I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best >> documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and >> it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded >> like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last >> point about <,> is quite hypothetical) > > Whatever. I feel insulted. :-(
And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..
