On 17/08/10 06:57, retard wrote:
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote:
Johannes Pfau Wrote:
On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote:
This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough
for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I
think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional
looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always
spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document
generation.
Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that
C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users
haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not
possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a
better tool in less than a week, blindfolded.
What's the point of this post?
I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best
documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and
it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded
like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last
point about<,> is quite hypothetical)
Whatever. I feel insulted. :-(
And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..
You are not a troll my dear retard. I am a troll.
