retard Wrote: > Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:12 -0400, lurker wrote: > > > Johannes Pfau Wrote: > > > >> On 16.08.2010 22:36, lurker wrote: > >> > > >> > This is unbelievable douchebaggery. The default ddoc IS good enough > >> > for most of us. There is simply no need for more complex tools. I > >> > think ddoc hits the sweet spot here by providing semi-professional > >> > looking html documents. Like someone said earlier, you can always > >> > spent a week worth of time creating a better tool for document > >> > generation. > >> > > >> > Doxygen STILL doesn't support D. What does this tell? It tells that > >> > C++ is crappy for software development. The millions of C++ users > >> > haven't been able to write a docgen support for D. It's just not > >> > possible. OTOH a qualified compiler veteran such as Walter wrote a > >> > better tool in less than a week, blindfolded. > >> > >> What's the point of this post? > >> I never wanted to replace ddoc in any way - the syntax is the best > >> documentation syntax that I've seen, the WYSIWYG ideology is great and > >> it's great that ddoc can output to different formats. If it sounded > >> like I was flaming or something, I did not want to. (I agree, the last > >> point about <,> is quite hypothetical) > > > > Whatever. I feel insulted. :-( > > And they try to convince themselves that I'm the troll..
Just. Go. To. Your. Ivory. Tower. period.
