Jonathan Davis Wrote: > bytes and shorts are legitimate values on their own, so it wouldn't > make sense to give the type to foreach as long.
Having wider integer always has sense. > byte or short on its own just fine. Yes, but odds are that it's a bug. You can easily hit an overflow. > So, it's almost a guarantee that the correct type for iterating over a > string or wstring is dchar, not char or wchar. String types are just > weird that way due to how multibyte unicode encodings work. If you don't like narrow strings, don't use them. Use dstring. You are free to write what you want. > So, since it makes so little sense to iterate over chars or wchars by default, > it would make sense to make the default dchar. It's an iteration over array items. This makes perfect sense.