== Quote from Kagamin (s...@here.lot)'s article > dsimcha Wrote: > > Hmm, lately I've been focusing my hacking efforts on > > debugging/polishing/removing > > annoying inconsistencies in Phobos. Maybe std.string should be my next > > target. > > It's generally a frustrating module because in addition to the wide > > character > > issue, lots of stuff requires immutable strings when it could work > > correctly and > > safely with a const or mutable string. > They say, there're bugs with inout. You don't need them fixed?
No. inout is only important where you can't/don't want to use templates. This is the case if you're concerned about code bloat, or need virtual functions. In std.string, not only **can** I use templates, I **have to** use them to deal with narrow vs. wide strings.
